|
10/3/05 - The U.S. Supreme Court today refused to block a lawsuit by the District of Columbia, as well as several D.C. residents injured or killed by gunfire, against gun manufacturers under D.C.'s Assault Weapons Manufacturing Strict Liability Act. The gun industry claimed that the Act, which makes assault weapon manufacturers and sellers strictly liable for injuries that result from the criminal use of those guns in the District, violated the U.S. Constitution and asked the Supreme Court to review the case. District Of Columbia v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.
Raleigh, NC (10/17/05) - The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence today filed a lawsuit on behalf of the widow of a Wake County, North Carolina Sheriff's Investigator, charging that a gun shop's negligence helped arm his killer.
Washington, D.C. (10/18/05) - Lawyers at the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, who have spearheaded lawsuits against negligent gun sellers and manufacturers, today said they intend to attack the constitutionality of the gun industry legal immunity bill scheduled to reach the House Floor tomorrow.
Washington D.C. (10/20/05) - The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence today said that the House of Representatives' passage of a bill taking away the rights of gun victims is a step backwards for a country founded on the rule of law. The bill has already been approved by the Senate, and if signed into law by President Bush, would essentially place the entire gun industry beyond the bounds of civil liability law.
Washington, D.C. (10/26/05) - Michael D. Barnes, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, released the following statement:
"Today, President George W. Bush added a sad item to his legacy. He became the first President in American history to take action to immunize a specific class of businesses from virtually all civil liability. It is left to a future President, or the courts, to undo this act."
"All Americans now have a little less protection from wrongdoing than we had before, and a little less freedom to seek justice. We are all less safe from the dangers posed by irresponsible gun companies. We are all diminished by this craven act."
Washington, D.C. (10/31/05) - How could it have gone in any other direction, from a White House that just gave blanket immunity to the gun industry, which refuses to bar terrorists from buying guns, that broke a campaign promise and put Uzis and AK-47s back on America's city streets, and insisted that records of gun purchases be destroyed before the sun sets on them twice?
|